Latest

DigiMAP demands Facebook to end policy of shutting down accounts discussing Taliban takeover in Kabul

The Digital Media Alliance of Pakistan (DigiMAP) has demanded of the Facebook management an end to its policy of shutting down accounts discussing Taliban takeover and considers it a worst form of censorship.

Facebook is arbitrarily shutting down accounts discussing Taliban takeover of Kabul and how the local communities are faring under the new rule of a group widely considered regressive in its ideology and quick to unleash aggression against critics and dissenters, especially women, the statement reads.

A particularly disturbing trend is that Facebook is blocking/limiting/restricting accounts of local journalists sharing their opinions and reports on the subject but is tolerating commentators in the west talking about the same on their Facebook profiles.

Journalist Adnan Rehmat’s case is a glaring example where his account was temporarily banned by Facebook ‘for posting a photo of ISI chief with Mullah Baradar’.

“Strangely, the account of Arif Jamal, from where I borrowed the picture, is active and the photo is still there”, Adnan Rehmat told The Reporters.

“Even if there is a banned organization, if its members appear in public space, then commenting or reporting on such characters is a journalist imperative, not personal. Facebook needs to understand this, which it is failing to do,” he said.

“Punishing journalists for their journalistic acts is itself an act of censorship and cannot constitute a part of any legitimate community guidelines. This ends up hurting democracy and helping achieve the very purpose of terrorist groups: to ban free speech and escape accountability,” Adnan Rehmat maintained.

Adnan Kakar, an editor at HumSub, noted that Arif Jamal lived in North America while Adnan Rehmat had made the post from Pakistan. It is pertinent to mention here that Adnan Kakar’s own account has also been permanently banned by Facebook.

Any dragnet also appears to be mistakenly entangling others who have posted content pushing back against the Taliban. After the news site HumSub published an article this month to counter a local newspaper column praising another Taliban founder, Mullah Muhammad Omar, Facebook removed the article, New York Times quoted Adnan Kakar as saying in a recent news story on Taliban’s ramped up presence on social media.

“Immediately, we got a message that ‘your article is removed because of standards on dangerous individuals and organizations,” he said.

Kakar said his personal account and HumSub’s Facebook page were also suspended for 24 hours and blocked from live streaming and advertising for 60 days. When he challenged Facebook, he said he got no response.

Compounding the difficulties facing the platforms, many of the new pro-Taliban accounts have been careful to post content that does not openly espouse violence or hate speech, which would violate the companies’ rules.

DigiMAP President Sabookh Syed’s account and the Facebook page of his website IBC Urdu has also been blocked by Facebook for reporting on the latest developments in Afghanistan.

We [DigiMAP] believe that this policy must be reviewed at the earliest and Facebook needs to stop shutting down local voices watching the situation unfold from the ground.

A petition to demand an end to ‘stop Facebook’s arbitrary restrictions/bans in the name of community standards’ has been started on change.org; we urge the readers to sign the petition, and help us be heard: https://www.change.org/p/facebook-stop-facebook-s-arbitrary-restrictions-bans-in-the-name-of-community-policies-freespeech

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button